Reuters image of V for Vendetta masks used in protests

A symbol does not have to be fully understood in order to be effective

The article http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15359735, from Rosie Waites for the BBC News Magazine offers an interesting perspective for all those Apathetic Anarchists interested in political dynamics. Why is this symbolic image being used in countries that have no affiliation with Guy Fawkes? Is it simply the international reach of Hollywood movies that allows a parochial figure to morph into a global phenomenon? Will the mask and its use be interpreted through the eyes of the central character of the movie, and his violent reaction to an oppressive regime or will it be through the non-violent final chapter of the movie, where thousands of masked citizens front soldiers and police in a vivid show of people-power?

Che Guevara was a human being, with all of the conflicted and illogical traits such a label entails. As well as representing the tortured rebel, seeking to overthrow tyranny and injustice, he was also just as aggressive against individuals or groups that disagreed with his other perspectives on social rights and wrongs. Seeing his famous visage on the tee-shirts of gay people illustrates the ways in which the idea behind such images can be greater than the facts (Che Guevara is accused of being staunchly homophobic, and including gays amongst those sent to internment camps – look it up on Google). So we have an image that is elevated beyond its factual presence and into the realm of mythology.

Is the Guy Fawkes mask about to make that same leap?

What is the movement that has suddenly “sprung up” around the world? How can something with the seemingly parochial banner of “Occupy Wall Street” cause a flow-on series of demonstrations around the globe? Is it really all about money?

Maybe but more likely maybe not.

The masses of the Great Unwashed are raising their heads above the television set, and have noticed that all is not well in the world of politics and representation. Fringe politicians and pressure groups are having a larger voice, leading to a misrepresentation of what the “average” person wants. For the Apathetic Anarchist, this is fertile ground. Clearly, anyone with a grudge will happily jump on board the Disruption Express but there is not doubt that the idea that “things just aren’t right” is one that will resonate in this environment.

Occupy Wall Street - what is the argument?

Is there a common thread? The NY Times thinks it is anger. What do you think?

 

You can’t really call a global series of protests “Occupy Wall Street”. There has to be a bigger theme common to all of these displays of angst. Have a read of Spiegel Online’s more global coverage…

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,792199,00.html#ref=nlint

or these comments from the New York Times article on the marchers and their aims…

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2011/10/17/opinion/krugman-wall-street-loses-its-immunity.html?sort=recommended

How about anarchy? Are these folk simply asking that the government that they operate under be more representative, less misprepresentative and a lot more aware of itself? In its purest form, Anarchy is the absence of government – but a good hard investigation into the history of anarchy will uncover the disturbing revelation that modern man needs a higher level of organisation than can be achieved by a large number of small communities. At the same time, the shortcomings of capitalism and its mixing with the practical implementation of an ideal democracy, will lead to the realisation that political systems haven’t yet evolved to the point where they can cope with a technology driven world.

So here’s a thought – what role is there for Anarchy in all of this? Is it simply a label that we can use to thought-bubble photos of smashed ATM’s and torched vehicles on urban streets or does it have a genuine place in the process of reform for political processes and systems?

How about “Vacate Wall Street“,

 and “Occupy My World“.

That’d be more in line with anarchist thought, and it can’t create anything worse than what we have now.

Anarchy in Action

Posted: 13th October 2011 by The ImModerator in Quick thoughts
Tags: , , , ,

Grab a gun, find a cause, and make a difference.

Stirring stuff, these calls to action – but what part would you play if the call was at your door? What if Paul Revere were riding past in the middle of the night, shouting for all and sundry to join the ranks of the downtrodden and oppressed?

For the Apathetic Anarchist, there is only one true answer to this question.

Spiegel picture of Libyan rebels fighting

You don't get more "grass roots" than this... a photo from Spiegel Online International

Clearly, the Apathetic Anarchist is the guy with the guitar.  He is the current Hero of this site.